Organizations leverage SDS Object Storage for a wide range of use cases including backup, archive, private cloud, hybrid cloud, and AI workloads. Beyond S3 compatibility for these use cases, factors such as data growth, ransomware, and AI pipelines push enterprises to evaluate SDS object platforms with greater care.
To that end, DCIG has started researching SDS object storage solutions available in the market today. The outcome will be a series of DCIG TOP 5 SDS Object Storage Solution Reports covering the top-ranked solutions. While still early, these six insights stand out among the twenty products researched thus far.
Insight #1: Three Market Lanes Emerge
Initial DCIG research shows these SDS products cluster into several emerging lanes.
These include:
Purpose-built object storage platforms: Examples include MinIO AIStor, Scality RING, Scality ARTESCA, and Zadara Object Storage. These products emphasize S3-compatible storage, scale-out capacity, data durability, security, and multitenancy.
Unified unstructured data platforms: Products in this lane offer a larger unstructured data management platform. Solutions from Qumulo, Quobyte, and WEKA offer file storage protocols such as NFS, SMB, and POSIX alongside object storage protocols. These products appeal to organizations that want to consolidate unstructured data workflows into one platform.
Ceph-based object storage platforms: A third group includes Ceph-based platforms from providers such as Red Hat, OSNexus, and Canonical. These solutions offer infrastructure flexibility, open-source foundations, and universal storage services (block, file, and object).
These lanes matter depending on whether an organization wants an object-first infrastructure or a broader solution offering unified or universal storage services.
Insight #2: Deployment Choice Defines SDS
Traditional SDS definitions center around software that runs independently of a fixed proprietary hardware platform. That definition still holds true. However, DCIG research finds many providers offer deployment models beyond a software-only approach.
About half of these providers also offer appliance, virtual appliance, public cloud, or managed-service deployment options.
This variety gives IT departments flexibility. A smaller enterprise may prefer a certified appliance. A cloud-first organization may need object storage services across public clouds. Other companies may want the benefits of outsourcing storage management services.
SDS Object Storage Deployment Models
Insight #3: S3 Compatibility Masks Differences.
Each of these SDS products offers S3-compatible access. However, S3 compatibility tells only part of the story.
Over half of these products implement S3 protocols through a native S3 object engine. Others expose S3 through gateway or protocol services. Still others layer object storage access over a broader file storage architecture.
These distinctions affect performance, scale, metadata handling, administration, cyber resilience, and feature depth.
As a result, buyers should evaluate not only S3 presence, but S3 architecture.
Insight #4: Hybrid Cloud Means Many Things
Hybrid cloud support frequently appears in product messaging. However, hybrid cloud capabilities vary widely.
In many cases, hybrid cloud means tiering, replication, or policy-based data movement. Fewer solutions document unified management between on-premises and cloud environments.
Feature distinctions impact hybrid cloud use cases. Organizations should clarify their needs for features such as tiering, replication, deployment options, management, failover capabilities, and unified access before comparing products.
Insight #5: Immutability Now Table Stakes
DCIG research shows providers commonly note object storage immutability. Additionally, products often offer object versioning, Object Lock, and retention mechanisms that prevent data modification or deletion.
However, cyber resilience extends beyond immutability. Many additional features affect how organizations protect, detect, and respond to cyberattacks. Examples include separated security and administrative roles, ransomware and anomaly detection, and other features designed to recover from compromised environments.
Thus, organizations should not assume that all SDS Object Storage solutions offer equivalent protections.
Insight #6: AI Claims Need Closer Scrutiny
AI has quickly become part of SDS object storage positioning. This makes sense. AI workloads depend on large data repositories, high throughput ingest, and integration with analytics and data pipeline tools. Object storage can play a crucial role in these environments.
However, AI feature documentation does not always support AI claims with details. This does not mean these products lack AI value. But it does mean organizations should look past broad AI messaging and assess a product’s AI capabilities and features in the context of the organization’s workloads.
SDS Object Storage – Similar Claims Do Not Mean Similar Capabilities
SDS Object Storage has moved well beyond basic S3-compatible capacity. These products offer notable options and differences in architecture, deployment models, cloud integration, cyber resilience, administration, and AI alignment.
These differences create opportunities and risks for organizations. On the positive side, organizations can find an object storage solution that meets their specific needs. However, similar claims do not mean similar capabilities.
It’s one of many reasons why DCIG TOP 5 reports are so valuable. They help organizations identify leading solutions, their distinguishing features, and why those features matter.
Keep Up To Date With DCIG
To be notified of new DCIG articles, reports, and webinars as well as DCIG’s upcoming TOP 5 reports on SDS Object Storage Solutions, sign up for DCIG’s free weekly Newsletter.
To learn about DCIG’s future research and publications, see the DCIG Editorial Calendar.
Technology providers interested in licensing DCIG TOP 5 reports or having DCIG produce custom reports on their behalf, please contact DCIG for more information.